Case study

Online store: relaunched 1,000+ products — orders from day one

An online store with 1,000+ products moved to a new CMS without losing visibility. Clicks and impressions up 13% around launch; orders on day one.

E-commercePlatform: DynamicwebPlatform relaunchTechnical SEO
A Norwegian online store (anonymised)4 min read
Google Search Console Performance graph over 3 months. Clicks, impressions and average position stay stable through the launch date of June 16, marked with a yellow circle.
Click growth
+13%

last 28 days vs. prior period

Impressions
+13%

760K vs. 670K

Orders
Day 1

from launch

Background: a client with good reason to be worried

The client is a Norwegian online store with more than a thousand products. They had been through a platform change before — the last time without anyone thinking about SEO along the way.

The result was what they themselves describe as "a proper crash". Traffic collapsed, sales followed, and it took a long time to recover. So when it was time to change platforms again — this time to Dynamicweb — the fear was real and well-founded.

"We knew the last one had gone wrong. We were terrified of another crash." — The client, before launch

What I did

A successful platform change isn't one single move. It's a sequence of the right decisions taken in the right order. Here's what we focused on.

Redirect plan before launch

The new platform meant a new URL structure. Every old URL with traffic and inbound links was mapped to its new destination. No important page was allowed to disappear without a 301 in place.

This alone is the main reason the previous attempt failed. Without a redirect plan you lose every bit of accumulated link authority overnight, and Google has to start over evaluating the site.

Canonical issues discovered and fixed

After launch a full Screaming Frog crawl surfaced a templating bug in Dynamicweb: canonical tags were being generated from imported legacy slugs instead of the pages' actual live URLs. 519 of 1,300 URLs were affected.

I categorised the problem into three fix types, produced a complete task list for the developer, and followed up until every canonical issue was resolved. This is exactly the kind of unexpected technical surprise a new CMS can throw at you — and the kind that only shows up if someone is actually looking.

SEO foundations in place from day one

robots.txt, sitemap.xml, canonical tags, and internal linking were verified both before and after launch. GA4 was set up in parallel so we had comparable data from the first day.

Continuous monitoring after launch

The first weeks after a platform change are the most critical. I followed Search Console closely for crawl errors, indexing issues, and any ranking swings.

A few technical surprises turned up — they always do — but they were caught and fixed quickly, before they had time to affect traffic.

The bot has already been through

The Coverage and Indexing reports in GSC haven't fully caught up yet — that's normal in the first weeks after a platform change. But the Core Web Vitals report tells its own clear story: both mobile and desktop report well over 1,100 good URLs, and zero poor ones. Google has been through and evaluated the new site.

In the same round, more structured data landed than before — a technical bonus the client gets thrown in, making the site easier to interpret for both Google and AI-driven search surfaces.

GSC Core Web Vitals: 1,164 good URLs on mobile and 1,162 on desktop, none poor.
Core Web Vitals after launch — green across the board on both mobile and desktop.

The result: stable from day one

Launch happened on 16 June 2026. The Search Console graph tells the story more clearly than any words: the curves stayed stable through and after the transition — no visible drops on launch day.

Last 28 days vs. prior period:

  • Clicks: 16,000 vs. 14,200 — up 13%.
  • Impressions: 760,000 vs. 670,000 — also up 13%.
  • Average position: 8.3 vs. 7.9 — a marginal shift, well within normal variation after a platform change.
  • Orders came in from day one. No negative effect on sales.
GSC Performance Compare view: clicks 16K vs. 14.3K, impressions 761K vs. 670K over the last 28 days.
Search Console, last 28 days vs. the previous period. Solid line = after launch, dashed = before.

"Orders came in from day one, and we didn't notice a negative difference." — The client, after launch

My advice

Planning a platform change? Involve an SEO specialist early — not as a last check before launch. The most important choices are made in the planning phase. And especially: don't let a fixed launch date come before the quality of the execution.

Anabel — grunnlegger av SmåSeo

Planning a platform change?

Don't let the launch date come before the execution

I get involved early, document the current state, build the redirect plan, and follow up during the critical weeks after launch.

  • Redirect plan before launch: I map every URL with traffic or backlinks and route each one to its new destination.
  • Technical SEO check after launch: A full crawl of the new site, so technical surprises get caught before they affect traffic.
  • Continuous monitoring through the transition: I watch Search Console closely in the weeks after launch and flag anything that deviates.